0
Special Article   |    
Litigation in Residency Training Programs and Suggested Due Process Guidelines for "Residents in Trouble"
Murray Brown; Pranav V. Shah; Arthur Brody; Sherwyn M. Woods; Joel Yager
Academic Psychiatry 1994;18:119-128.
View Article Information
School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA); Residency Education, UCLA/San Fernando Vally Psychiatry Training Program
School of Medicine, UCLA; UCLA/San Fernando Vally Psychiatry Training Program
psychiatry; president, Residency Council, UCLA Neuropsychiatric Institute and West Los Angeles Veterans Administration Medical Center (VAMC)
Psychoanalytic Education and Student Psychiatric Health Service, University of Southern California School of Medicine
School of Medicine, UCLA; Department of Psychiatry, West Los Angeles VAMC
© 1994 Academic Psychiatry.
text A A A
PDF of the full text article.
Abstract
Litigation involving the dismissal of residents has increased in the past decades. A review of relevant court decisions and their implications for residency training programs is provided. To assure due process in such cases and to help programs deal fairly with situations involving problem residents that may never come to frank dismissal, a set of guidelines to assist training programs in dealing with residents "in trouble" is presented. The guidelines were developed collaboratively at University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) and the University of Southern California (USC) and were reviewed and approved by the local hospital, university, and Veterans Affairs counsels to assure compliance with institutional policies and procedures regulating due process for employees and students. The guidelines were also reviewed and approved by an American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training (AADPRT) task force, but they were never published or widely distributed. Although modifications of these guidelines may be required to meet local educational or institutional variations, or to meet variations in state law or precedent, these suggestions provide a useful template with which to develop adequate and effective due process procedures.Abstract Teaser
Figures in this Article

    Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.
    Sign In Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.
    Sign In to Access Full Content
     
    Username
    Password
    Sign in via Athens (What is this?)
    Athens is a service for single sign-on which enables access to all of an institution's subscriptions on- or off-site.
    Not a subscriber?

    Subscribe Now/Learn More

    PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-IV-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

    Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing PsychiatryOnline@psych.org or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

    +
    +
    +

    CME Activity

    There is currently no quiz available for this resource. Please click here to go to the CME page to find another.
    Submit a Comments
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discertion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe



    Related Content
    Articles
    Books
    The American Psychiatric Publishing Textbook of Geriatric Psychiatry, 4th Edition > Chapter 33.  >
    The American Psychiatric Publishing Textbook of Substance Abuse Treatment, 4th Edition > Chapter 47.  >
    Textbook of Traumatic Brain Injury, 2nd Edition > Chapter 34.  >
    Topic Collections
    Psychiatric News