0
1
REGULAR ARTICLES   |    
Incentives for Teaching Psychiatry
David Bienenfeld; Ronald Markert; John Rudisill; Paulette Gillig; James A. Bourgeois; William Klykylo; Brenda Roman; Barbara Warner; Jerald Kay
Academic Psychiatry 1997;21:91-97.
View Article Information
The opinion expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not represent the official views of the Department of the Air Force, the Department of the Defense, or other federal agencies.
Department of Psychiatry, Wright State University School of Medicine
Department of Medicine, Wright State University School of Medicine
© 1997 Academic Psychiatry.
text A A A
PDF of the full text article.
Abstract
A questionnaire was sent to chairs and faculty in 137 academic departments of psychiatry regarding the methods used to promote teaching and their perceived value. The incentives most often used included promotion and retention, nomination to committees, and peer recognition. Least often used were bonuses and a designated teachers' career track. Chairs and their faculty often disagreed as to whether some incentives were being used at all. Recognition of teaching excellence was generally most highly valued as a useful incentive. Clarification of the nature and purpose of teaching incentives would likely improve their effectiveness.Abstract Teaser
Figures in this Article

    +
    +
    +

    CME Activity

    There is currently no quiz available for this resource. Please click here to go to the CME page to find another.
    Submit a Comments
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discertion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe



    Related Content
    Articles
    Topic Collections
    Psychiatric News
    PubMed Articles