The final section on psychiatric administration (four chapters) includes "Development as a Psychiatric Administrator," "Academic Psychiatry and the Public Sector," "Canadian Solutions to Constricting Academic Resources," and one on "Health Care Systems and Academic Psychiatry." This last, by Ross and Scharfstein, is one of the best, and clearly the most thought-provoking, since it addresses several of the conundrums that change has forced on the academic scene. The fact that it is the only one to really do so is a minor cavil with the book, since the editors' introduction enumerates the shifting sands and difficulties we face and promises the contents will deal with them. Valuable as they are, the vast majority of the chapters are mostly curriculum and business-as-they-used-to-be-usual, and say little about managed care. In this chapter, the authors face the facts that the behavioral health care organizations have the money—and the patients—and that our own preferences count little, and that most universities have cumbersome administrations and cost structures ill-suited to competition for contracts. They say outright that most resident programs will have to "right-size," that means downsize, and that the realities of today's care make the Residency Review Committee's 9-month inpatient requirement (to observe course of illness) an anachronism. The authors note that academic psychiatry has to make choices about social workers doing most of the psychotherapy (and the role modeling involved in such a case) and about training residents to work with them on medications, and the authors suggest boldly that feedback on productivity in terms of units of service should be an important measure for both faculty and residents.