Academic Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Dawkins, K.
* Articles by Golden, R. N.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Dawkins, K.
* Articles by Golden, R. N.
Related Collections
* Education, Psychiatrists
Academic Psychiatry 29:69-75, March 2005
© 2005 Academic Psychiatry


ORIGINAL

The Relationship Between Psychiatry Residency Applicant Evaluations and Subsequent Residency Performance

Karon Dawkins, M.D., R. David Ekstrom, M.D., M.P.H., Allan Maltbie, M.D. and Robert N. Golden, M.D.

Drs. Dawkins, Ekstrom, Maltbie, and Golden are with the Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Address correspondence to Dr. Dawkins, Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill, Campus Box 7160, 101 Manning Dr., Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7160; karon_dawkins{at}med.unc.edu (E-mail).

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to measure the predictive value of applicant evaluations for a psychiatry residency in terms of the subsequent performance of those who matriculated in the program. METHOD: The match lists for resident cohorts beginning their course of training over 4 years were divided into thirds, which served as our primary, preresidency measure of expected performance. The preresidency applicant evaluations of those residents who entered were compared to their postresidency evaluations. RESULTS: There was no significant association between preresidency selection evaluations and postresidency final evaluations in any of the four cohorts of trainees. CONCLUSIONS: The overall results of this study of four cohorts of residents indicate only a small, nonsignificant association between pre- and postresidency evaluations. Further efforts to predict residency performance in applicants may help identify those trainees who might benefit from additional monitoring and supervision.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Acad. PsychiatryHome page
M. K. Bak, A. K. Louie, L. D. Tong, J. Coverdale, and L. Weiss Roberts
Applying to Psychiatry Residency Programs
Acad Psychiatry, June 1, 2006; 30(3): 239 - 247.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2005 Academic Psychiatry. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Association of Chairs of Departments of Psychiatry American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training Association of Directors of Medical Student Education in Psychiatry Association for Academic Psychiatry
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org