Academic Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Cogbill, K. K.
* Articles by Clardy, J.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Cogbill, K. K.
* Articles by Clardy, J.
Related Collections
* Education, Psychiatrists
Academic Psychiatry 29:76-81, March 2005
© 2005 Academic Psychiatry


ORIGINAL

Residents’ Perception of Effectiveness of Twelve Evaluation Methods for Measuring Competency

Kay K. Cogbill, M.D., Patricia S. O’Sullivan, Ed.D. and James Clardy, M.D.

Drs. Cogbill, O’Sullivan, and Clardy are with the College of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and the Office of Educational Development at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. O’Sullivan, Office of Educational Development, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Slot 595, 5301 W. Markham, Little Rock, AR 71923; psosullivan{at}uams.edu (E-mail).

OBJECTIVE: The authors assessed residents’ perceptions of techniques used to evaluate competency. METHODS: Psychiatry residents from a single program rated 12 evaluation techniques for their effectiveness to measure resident competency. They rated each method for 25 selected skills reflecting the six general competencies. RESULTS: Sixteen residents (70%) completed the survey. Responses indicated that different methods were effective for different competencies. Residents saw objective structured clinical examinations and standardized patients as equally effective. They favored the 360° evaluation method for all competencies except medical knowledge. Resident perception of the effective techniques differed from preferred techniques identified by measurement experts. CONCLUSIONS: Residency program directors using guidelines from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) to select preferred evaluations may find that residents do not have the same perceptions.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Acad. PsychiatryHome page
D. J. Robinson
A Training and Examination Program to Prepare Psychiatric Residents for OSCE-Style Exams
Acad Psychiatry, July 1, 2009; 33(4): 331 - 334.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Acad. PsychiatryHome page
S. I. Kramer
Where There's Smoke, Can There be Fire?
Acad Psychiatry, November 1, 2008; 32(6): 458 - 459.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Acad. PsychiatryHome page
K. A. Khurshid, J. I. Bennett, S. Vicari, K. L. Lee, and K. E. Broquet
Residency Programs and Psychotherapy Competencies: A Survey of Chief Residents
Acad Psychiatry, December 1, 2005; 29(5): 452 - 458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2005 Academic Psychiatry. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Association of Chairs of Departments of Psychiatry American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training Association of Directors of Medical Student Education in Psychiatry Association for Academic Psychiatry
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org