Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Swick, S. Articles by Beresin, E. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Swick, S. Articles by Beresin, E.

Assessing the ACGME Competencies in Psychiatry Training Programs

Received April 13, 2005; revised December 4, 2005; accepted December 16, 2005. Dr. Swick is affiliated with the Massachusetts General Hospital Child Psychiatry Service, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Ms. Hall is affiliated with the Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Residency Training Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Dr. Beresin is affiliated with the Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Residency Training, Massachusetts General Hospital and McLean Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Address correspondence to Dr. Swick, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Child Psychiatry, YAW-6-6A, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA 02114. Copyright © 2006 Academic Psychaitry.

In 2000, the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) laid out a definition of competence that included six specific areas of focus: patient care (including clinical reasoning), medical knowledge, practice-based learning and improvement, interpersonal and communication skills, professionalism, and systems-based practice. The ACGME’s intention was to mandate increasingly reliable and valid assessment measures to be used by all training programs over the next decade, with the goal of providing "more credible, accurate, reliable and useful educational outcome data." In this article, the authors will review definitions of competency according to the new ACGME standards and examine the assessment tools currently available, including global evaluations, 360-degree evaluations, checklists, standardized examinations and direct observations. The authors will provide an overview of critical considerations in different assessment methods, including timing, psychometric properties, benchmarks, and feedback. Finally, the authors will discuss the relevant literature concerning the strengths and weaknesses of these various assessment tools. Throughout, the authors will comment on the applicability of the literature on assessment to the field of psychiatry and consider directions for competency assessment within and beyond psychiatric training. Following the paper is an annotated bibliography of the literature for those wishing to explore this topic more deeply and a list of web-based resources that may be used by those wishing to access available instruments.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Fung, L. Andermann, A. Zaretsky, and H.-T. Lo An Integrative Approach to Cultural Competence in the Psychiatric Curriculum Acad Psychiatry, July 1, 2008; 32(4): 272 - 282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Walaszek Quality and Quantity: Gauging the Effects of the New ACGME Program Requirements for Inpatient Psychiatric Education Acad Psychiatry, August 1, 2007; 31(4): 261 - 265. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Mennin Assessing the ACGME Competencies in Psychiatry Training Programs Acad Psychiatry, August 1, 2006; 30(4): 279 - 280. [Full Text] [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2006 Academic Psychiatry. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us