Academic Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Acad Psychiatry 31:40-49, January-February 2007
doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.31.1.40
© 2007 Academic Psychiatry
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Correction (v31,p172)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Krain, L. P.
* Articles by Sampson, S.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Krain, L. P.
* Articles by Sampson, S.
Related Collections
* Miscellaneous Education and Training

"It’s High-Tech, But Is It Better?": Applications of Technology in Psychiatry Education

Lewis P. Krain, M.D., J. Michael Bostwick, M.D. and Shirlene Sampson, M.D.

Received December 15, 2005; revised April 4, 2006; accepted April 14, 2006. Dr. Krain is affiliated with the Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Address correspondence to Dr. Krain, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Box 0118, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; vanallen{at}umich.edu (e-mail).

OBJECTIVE: This article reviews the existing literature on the use of computer assisted instruction (CAI) in the field of psychiatry to answer the questions, 1) Is CAI an effective tool for teaching psychiatry? and 2) What are the best methods for studying CAI in a real-world training environment? METHOD: A Medline search was conducted for relevant articles, which were divided into three categories: media comparative (head-to-head trials), demonstration (reports of single CAI interventions), or analytical (commentary/reviews). RESULTS: Twenty articles were identified. Although they tend to show that CAI is as good as or sometimes better than traditional teaching methods, the data are extremely variable and there are significant methodological difficulties that complicate interpretation of the data. These problems are consistent with difficulties experienced in other medical specialties when studying CAI. CONCLUSIONS: It is difficult to draw conclusions about the efficacy of CAI in psychiatry from this disparate sample of articles. Efforts to compare CAI interventions with traditional teaching methods have significant inherent limitations and biases and are very difficult to conduct in a naturalistic educational setting. The author offers alternative approaches to studying CAI in psychiatry.







Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2007 Academic Psychiatry. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Association of Chairs of Departments of Psychiatry American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training Association of Directors of Medical Student Education in Psychiatry Association for Academic Psychiatry
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org