Academic Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Acad Psychiatry 31:439-442, November-December 2007
doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.31.6.439
© 2007 Academic Psychiatry
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Shah, N.
* Articles by Searle, N.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Shah, N.
* Articles by Searle, N.

Increasing the Rate of Return of Resident Rotation Evaluations by Their Attending Physicians in an In-Patient Psychiatric Facility

Nurun Shah, M.D., Britta Thompson, Ph.D., Patricia Averill, Ph.D. and Nancy Searle, Ed.D.

Received July 19, 2006; revised February 23, 2007; accepted June 27, 2007. From the Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Harris County Psychiatric Center (N.S., P.A.), and the Department of Psychiatry, Baylor College of Medicine (B.T., N.S.). Address correspondence to Dr. Averill, University of Texas Harris County Psychiatric Center–Psychiatry, 2800 South MacGregor Way, Houston, Texas, 77021; patricia.averill{at}uth.tmc.edu (e-mail).

OBJECTIVE: Psychiatrist’s evaluations of residents are the primary means of determining whether the residents are ready to be promoted. However, the return rate for evaluations is quite low. The purpose of this study was to increase the return rates. METHODS: Feedback from two surveys and open discussion was utilized to develop and implement a system for increasing completion rates. Completion rates before and after the intervention were compared. RESULTS: The survey revealed that the initial evaluation form was too complex and not readily available. In addition, participants indicated that reminders would be helpful for increasing compliance. Completion rates were 48% and 80% for the 4 months prior and after the intervention, respectively. CONCLUSION: Addressing the problem and implementing suggested strategies increased completion rates significantly. However, it is unclear which strategy was most associated with the change. Future directions will focus on determining whether gains will be maintained and what would be necessary to obtain 100% compliance rates.

Key Words: Residents • Evaluation • Promotion







Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2007 Academic Psychiatry. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Association of Chairs of Departments of Psychiatry American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training Association of Directors of Medical Student Education in Psychiatry Association for Academic Psychiatry
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org