Academic Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Acad Psychiatry 33:319-322, July-August 2009
doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.33.4.319
© 2009 Academic Psychiatry
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
* Articles by Whelan, P.
* Articles by Kadry, K.
PubMed
* Articles by Whelan, P.
* Articles by Kadry, K.

Brief Report

Using Standardized Patients’ Marks in Scoring Postgraduate Psychiatry OSCEs

Paul Whelan, M.D., M.Sc., M.R.C.Psych, Laurence Church, M.D., M.Sc., M.R.C.Psych and Khaled Kadry, M.D., M.R.C.Psych

Received August 20, 2007; revised November 19, 2007, and March 16, 2008; accepted April 23, 2008. The authors are affiliated with South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust in London. Address correspondence to Paul James Whelan, South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, Old Age Psychiatry, Guy’s Hospital, Weston St, London, SE1 3RR, United Kingdom; paul.whelan{at}nhs.net (e-mail).

OBJECTIVE: Standardized patients (SPs) do not contribute scores in postgraduate psychiatry objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) in the United Kingdom. However, this may change in the near future. The primary aim of this study was to measure the degree of agreement between scores given by examiners and those given by SPs in an OSCE. METHODS: The authors measured the degree of agreement in two consecutive postgraduate OSCEs for psychiatric residents on a London training scheme. RESULTS: Fifty-five candidates participated in the two OSCEs. There was a moderate degree of agreement between examiner and SP scores for communication and for the overall mark. However, there was a stronger relationship between the examiner score for communication and the candidates’ overall mark. CONCLUSION: Examiners and SPs scored candidates differently. Therefore, the decision to include SP scores in the marking scheme for postgraduate OSCEs would be a significant development.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Acad. PsychiatryHome page
B. D. Hodges and N. McNaughton
Who Should Be an OSCE Examiner?
Acad Psychiatry, July 1, 2009; 33(4): 282 - 284.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2009 Academic Psychiatry. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Association of Chairs of Departments of Psychiatry American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training Association of Directors of Medical Student Education in Psychiatry Association for Academic Psychiatry
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org