Academic Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Acad Psychiatry 33:383-388, September-October 2009
doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.33.5.383
© 2009 Academic Psychiatry
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
* Articles by Goldman, S.
* Articles by Kemler, B.
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Goldman, S.
* Articles by Kemler, B.

Psychiatry Morbidity and Mortality Rounds: Implementation and Impact

Stuart Goldman, M.D., David R. Demaso, M.D. and Beth Kemler, Ph.D., LICSW

Received April 30, 2008; revised November 21, 2008; accepted January 6, 2009. Drs. Goldman and Kemler are affiliated with Psychiatry at Children’s Hospital Boston; Dr. DeMaso is affiliated with Psychiatry at Harvard Medical School in Boston. Address correspondence to Stuart Goldman, M.D., Children’ Hospital Boston, Psychiatry, 300 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115; stuart.goldman{at}childrens.harvard.edu (e-mail).

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the implementation of psychiatry morbidity and mortality rounds (M&Ms) on the clinical and educational practice in a children’s hospital. METHODS: Attendees to monthly M&Ms between July 2005 and May 2007 included staff and trainees from psychiatry, psychology, nursing, and social work. Cases were selected based on a priori risk criteria and each rated on the hospital’s four-level risk management scale. M&Ms were reviewed for recurrent patterns that contributed to adverse patient care. Attendees completed a survey at the end of each year, evaluating the educational value of the rounds. RESULTS: Possible opportunities for patient care improvement were found in 80% of the cases and fell into four overlapping areas: diagnostic/formulation errors, communication problems, system-based problems, and class/culture misunderstandings. Identifying these problems led to corrective actions and positive changes in patient care. CONCLUSION: M&Ms appear to be a potentially productive venue for self-appraisal and case review to aid psychiatry programs in patient safety efforts and clinician education.







Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2009 Academic Psychiatry. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Association of Chairs of Departments of Psychiatry American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training Association of Directors of Medical Student Education in Psychiatry Association for Academic Psychiatry
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org